The plural meem according to Ibn Ghalboun in Al-Irshad and Makki Al-Qaisi in Al-Tabisrah (compare and direct)

Abstract

   Praise be to God, Lord of the Worlds, and may blessings and peace be upon the Master of Messengers, our Master Muhammad, and upon his good and pure family and companions, and those who follow them in righteousness until the Day of Judgment.

   And after:

    I had the honor of studying a little bit of the science of readings, under the title (The meme of plural according to Ibn Ghalboun in guidance and Makki al-Qaysi in insight (comparison and guidance), and the nature of the research required that it consist of an introduction, two sections, and a conclusion. I explained in the introduction the importance of the topic, the reasons for choosing it, and the objectives of the research. And his plan and method.

In the first topic, I learned about the two Imams Ibn Ghalboun and Makki al-Qaisi and learned about their books, in two sections, by mentioning the name of each of them, his lineage, his nickname, his birth, his death, his academic standing, and introducing his book. The second topic was about the ruling on the plural meme according to Ibn Ghalboun and Makki al-Qaisi. Guide this reading.

The research ended with a conclusion that showed the most important results of the research, the most important of which are:

A - They unanimously agreed that every ha and meem were pluralized with a sukun after it and before the yaa there was a sakunah or kasra. Hamza and Al-Kisa’i recited it by adding the ha and the meem, and Abu Amr broke them in the wasl specifically, and the rest broke the haa and joined the meem, without filling it with a haf and a waw, and there is no disagreement about breaking the ha as a stop for all.

B - Makki al-Qaisi permitted the rhum and the isham in the plural meem that joins the waw as a connective and deletes a stop, and gave reasons for that.

C- It is not permissible to pronounce rhum and isham in the accusative plural meem, avoiding the meeting of two consonants.

D - Ibn Ghalboun did not mention rum and shamam in the plural meem, and therefore he treats it as a casual movement, as there is neither rum nor shamam in it, and God Almighty knows best.