اشكالية التلقي في النقد الأدبي العربي القديم

Abstract

The theory of reception, or what is also called the aesthetic of receiving, was proposed at the end of the eighties of the last century, the relationship between literature and the recipient as it clarifies the three dimensions (the author - the text - the recipient), which led to the receiving theory having various problems as long as they relate to the recipient self which is to reproduce the text when This differs in the act of understanding and perception in different recipients, and this works to intensify the meaning, so the text writes its permanence and immortality as a result of the dialogue between the evidence and the recipient, despite the novelty of the theory, and the term, but its first roots were with the ancient Arabs,

The aesthetic phenomenon requires the culture of the recipient who savors the literary work through his sensitivity and gustatory receptors and the resulting aesthetic emotions for this literary material and the relationship between the text and his reader is governed by a set of mental, psychological and gustatory processes in which literary readers participate in their different ages, the research addressed the most important things that critics have done in That stage of a critical article The theory of receiving developed its historical critical context, where its first roots began with the old Arab (recipient) critic, after which the German school of Kovestans developed integrated monetary frameworks, to become this integrated theory known as the theory of Receiving, which is the rebuilding of a new concept of the concept of the creative process in terms of being through time - history - and ways to understand the correct reading and the role of the reader in producing this process or text. This theory concerned the recipient as the most important element among the elements of creative work, but it complements that work all the time with its various readers. His perceptions and tools vary and go away from the interpretation of internal codes and textual building mechanisms. This understanding, interpretation and analysis in the history of criticism, literature and philosophy came through his natural evolution through time