Ibn Hisham’s Position on Ibn Malik in (Al-Mughni)

Ibn Hisham’s Position on Ibn Malik in (Al-Mughni)

Authors

  • Asst.Prof. Amal Muhammad Abd Al-Karim (Ph.D.) كلية التربية للبنات / جامعة البصرة

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.58564/ma.v14i35.1347

Keywords:

Keywords: grammatical position, Ibn Hisham, Ibn Malik

Abstract

The aim of the research was to explain Ibn Hisham’s position in his book Mughni al-Labib vis-à-vis Ibn Malik, in which I briefly introduced the book Mughni al-Labib, and explained Ibn Hisham’s position vis-à-vis Ibn Malik in the chapter on interpreting vocabulary and mentioning its rulings, and in the chapter on interpreting the sentence, mentioning its divisions and rulings, as well as Ibn Hisham’s position on Ibn Malik in the chapter on the adverb, the genitive case, and the nominative case, in the chapter on mentioning rulings that frequently occur and the ignorance of which is disgraceful to the parser, and on the matter of mentioning the aspects in which the definite article is faulty, and Ibn Hisham’s position on Ibn Malik on the subject of warning about matters that are well-known among the people. The correct thing is to say otherwise, as a matter of mentioning general matters from which countless partial forms emerge, then the conclusion, which contains the most important results:

The number of positions Ibn Hisham had with regard to Ibn Malik in Al-Mughni’s book is approximately ninety-one positions

Ibn Hisham agreed with Ibn Malik in thirteen situations

Ibn Hisham disagreed with Ibn Malik in forty-nine positions

Ibn Hisham mentioned Ibn Malik's opinion but did not delve into it in twenty-nine instances

Published

2024-06-02