المدارس الأصولية (مناهجها وأعلامها) من التأسيس إلى القرن الثالث عشر الهجري لدى علماء الامامية (دراسة مقارنة)

Abstract

Abstract

The need to study the science of jurisprudence and delve into the research with its issues is of importance to everyone who addresses the discovery of legal rulings. The researcher differs in this science that the fundamentalist thought has evolved in an uneven way, up and down, and noticeable over the ages, which is a natural matter, and the development that occurred for this science is a development in its tools, methods, and means in obtaining subsidiary legal rulings from their detailed evidence that is commensurate with the development of the science of jurisprudence and the abundance of renewable facts and development occurring in daily life.
In this research, we dealt with the statement of development and growth that took place in the scientific thought of the front-line fundamentalist schools and the organization of their curricula from their inception and the need for them, by extrapolating the fundamentalist output of most of the scholars of the fundamentalist schools independently, as well as the fundamentalist studies and investigations of a group of researchers, which were written and express the level of thought The divergent fundamentalists in the later eras, and the results and studies that focused on this aspect and became a point of view for scholars of the science of jurisprudence, showing the highlights of the points of agreement and disagreement, and explaining the methods of inference and the methods used and different for them.